 |
|
Welcome
to
YalePharma
Worldwide !
|
Audit and Corporate
Responsibility Committee
Under the terms of
its Charter, the Audit
Committee meets at least
six times a year, including
periodic meetings held
separately with management,
the internal auditor
and the independent
auditor. The Audit Committee
represents and assists
the Board with the oversight
of the integrity of
the Company's financial
statements and internal
controls, the Company's
compliance with legal
and regulatory requirements,
the independent auditor's
qualifications and independence,
the performance of the
Company's internal audit
function and the independent
auditor. In addition,
the Committee is responsible
for:
1. selecting
and retaining (subject
to approval by our shareholders),
and terminating when
appropriate, the independent
auditor;
2. setting
the independent auditor's
compensation, overseeing
the work of the independent
auditor and pre-approving
all audit services to
be provided by the independent
auditor;
3. establishing
policies and procedures
for the engagement of
the independent auditor
to provide permitted
non-audit services and
pre-approving the performance
of such permitted non-audit
services;
4. receiving
and reviewing at least
annually:
-
a
report by the independent
auditor describing
the independent
auditor's internal
quality-control
procedures and any
material issues
raised by the most
recent internal
quality-control
review, peer review,
or Public Company
Accounting Oversight
Board (PCAOB) review,
of the independent
auditing firm, or
by any inquiry or
investigation by
governmental or
professional authorities,
within the preceding
five years, respecting
one or more independent
audits carried out
by the firm, and
any steps taken
to deal with any
such issues; and
-
other
required reports
from the independent
auditor;
5. considering,
at least annually, the
independence of the
independent auditor,
including whether the
provision by the independent
auditor of permitted
non-audit services is
compatible with independence;
6. obtaining
and reviewing a report
from the independent
auditor describing all
relationships between
the auditor and the
Company;
7. reviewing
with the independent
auditor:
-
the
scope and results
of the audit;
-
any
problems or difficulties
that the auditor
encountered in the
course of the audit
work, and management's
response; and
-
any
questions, comments
or suggestions the
auditor may have
relating to the
internal controls
and accounting practices
and procedures,
of the Company or
its subsidiaries
- reviewing, at least
annually, the scope
and results of the internal
audit program, including
current and future programs
of the Company's Internal
Audit Department, procedures
for implementing accepted
recommendations made
by the independent auditor,
and any significant
matters contained in
reports from the Internal
Audit Department;
8. reviewing
with the independent
auditor, the Company's
Internal Audit Department,
and management:
1.
the adequacy and effectiveness
of the systems of
internal controls
(including any significant
deficiencies and significant
changes in internal
controls reported
to the Audit Committee
by the independent
auditor or management);
2. accounting practices,
and disclosure controls
and procedures (and
related management
reports), of the Company
and its subsidiaries;
and
3. current accounting
trends and developments;
and taking such action
with respect to these
matters as may be
deemed appropriate;
9. reviewing
with management and
the independent auditor
the annual and quarterly
financial statements
of the Company, including:
the Company's disclosures
under "Management's
Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations";
any material changes
in accounting principles
or practices used in
preparing the financial
statements prior to
the filing of a report
on Form 10-K or 10-Q
with the Securities
and Exchange Commission;
and the items required
by Statement of Auditing
Standards 61 as in effect
at that time in the
case of the annual statements
and Statement of Auditing
Standards 100 as in
effect at that time
in the case of the quarterly
statements;
10. recommending
to the Board of Directors
whether the financial
statements should be
included in the annual
report on Form 10-K;
11. reviewing
earnings press releases,
as well as Company policies
with respect to earnings
press releases, financial
information and earnings
guidance provided to
analysts and rating
agencies (this function
may be performed by
the Chair or the full
Committee);
12. discussing
Company policies with
respect to risk assessment
and risk management,
reviewing contingent
liabilities and risks
which may be material
to the Company and reviewing
major legislative and
regulatory developments
which could materially
impact the Company's
contingent liabilities
and risks;
13. reviewing
reports from management,
legal counsel and third
parties as determined
by the Audit Committee
relating to the status
of compliance with laws,
regulations, and internal
procedures; and the
scope and status of
systems designed to
promote Company compliance
with laws, regulations
and internal procedures;
14. establishing
procedures for the confidential
and anonymous receipt,
retention and treatment
of complaints regarding
the Company's accounting,
internal controls and
auditing matters;
15. establishing
procedures for receipt
of confidential, anonymous
submissions by Company
employees of concerns
regarding questionable
accounting or auditing
matters;
16. establishing
policies for the hiring
of employees and former
employees of the independent
auditor;
17. obtaining
the advice and assistance,
as appropriate, of independent
counsel and other advisors
as necessary to fulfill
its responsibilities
and determining appropriate
funding to be received
from the Company for
payment of compensation
to any such advisors;
18. conducting
an annual performance
evaluation of the Audit
Committee and an evaluation
of the adequacy of its
charter; and
19. preparing
a report each year concerning
compliance with its
charter for inclusion
in the Company's annual
Proxy Statement.
-
The
Board of Directors
has determined that
each of the current
members of the Audit
Committee—Mr.
Smith, Mr. Johnson,
and Mr. MacKay
—is an "audit
committee financial
expert" for purposes
of the SEC's rules.
-
The
Board of Directors
also has determined
that each of the members
of the Audit Committee
is "independent,"
as defined by the
rules of the NASDAQ.
Under the terms of
its Charter, the Corporate
Governance Committee
is responsible for considering
and making recommendations
to the Board concerning
the appropriate size,
function and needs of
the Board. This responsibility
includes:
1. developing
and recommending to
the Board the Criteria
for Board Membership;
2. considering, recommending
and recruiting candidates
to fill new positions
on the Board;
3. reviewing candidates
recommended by shareholders;
4. conducting the appropriate
and necessary inquiries
into the backgrounds
and qualifications of
possible candidates;
and
5. recommending the
Director nominees for
approval by the Board
and the shareholders.
The Committees additional
functions are:
-
to
consider questions
of possible conflicts
of interest of Board
members and of our
senior executives;
-
to monitor
and recommend the
functions of the various
committees of the
Board;
-
to recommend
members of the committees;
-
to advise
on changes in Board
compensation;
-
to make
recommendations on
the structure of Board
meetings; and
-
to
recommend matters
for consideration
by the Board.
- considers matters of
corporate governance,
and reviews our Corporate
Governance Principles
at least annually.
- considers and reviews,
periodically, Director
Qualification Standards
- reviews, periodically,
our policy regarding the
adoption of a Shareholder
Rights Plan;
- establishes Director
retirement policies;
- reviews the functions
of the senior officers
and makes recommendations
on changes;
- reviews annually with
the Chairman and CEO the
job performance of elected
corporate officers and
other senior executives;
- reviews the outside
activities of senior executives;
- reviews, periodically,
with the Chairman and
CEO the succession plans
relating to positions
held by elected corporate
officers, and makes recommendations
to the Board with respect
to the selection of individuals
to occupy these positions;
- oversees the evaluation
of the Board and its Committees;
and
- prepares an annual performance
evaluation of the Corporate
Governance Committee.
The Committee may,
in its sole discretion,
engage director search
firms and may consult
with outside advisors
to assist it in carrying
out its duties to the
Company. The Committee
has the sole authority
to approve the fees
and other retention
terms with respect to
any such firms.
Criteria for Board Membership
To fulfill its responsibility
to recruit and recommend
to the full Board nominees
for election as Directors,
the Corporate Governance
Committee reviews the
composition of the full
Board to determine the
qualifications and areas
of expertise needed
to further enhance the
composition of the Board
and works with management
in attracting candidates
with those qualifications.
Appropriate criteria
for Board membership
include the following:
-
Members
of the Board should
be individuals of
high integrity and
independence, substantial
accomplishments, and
prior or current association
with institutions
noted for their excellence.
-
Members
of the Board should
have demonstrated
leadership ability,
with broad experience,
diverse perspectives,
and the ability to
exercise sound business
judgment.
-
The
background and experience
of members of the
Board should be in
areas important to
the operation of the
Company such as business,
education, finance,
government, law, medicine,
or science.
-
The
composition of the
Board should reflect
sensitivity to the
need for diversity
as to gender, ethnic
background and experience.
In addition,
pursuant to our Corporate
Governance principles,
the Committee considers
the number of other
Boards of public companies
on which a candidate
serves. Moreover, Directors
are expected to act
ethically at all times
and adhere to the Company's
Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics for members
of the Board of Directors.
The Committee
considers candidates
for Director suggested
by our shareholders,
provided that the recommendations
are made in acordance
with the procedures
required under our By-laws
and described in our
Proxy Statement under
the heading "Requirements,
including Deadlines
for Submission of Shareholder
Proposals, Nomination
of Directors and Other
Business of Shareholders."
Shareholder nominees
whose nominations comply
with these procedures,
and who meet the criteria
outlined above, in the
Committee's Charter,
and in our Corporate
Governance Principles,
will be evaluated by
the Corporate Governance
Committee in the same
manner as the Committee's
nominees.
The Board
of Directors has determined
that each of the members
of the Corporate Governance
Committee is independent,
as defined by the rules
of the NASDAQ Stock
Exchange.
Under the terms of
its Charter, the Compensation
Committee is directly
responsible for establishing
annual and long-term
performance goals and
objectives for our elected
officers. This responsibility
includes:
-
evaluating
the performance of the
CEO and other elected
officers in light of
approved performance
goals and objectives;
-
setting
the compensation of
the CEO and other elected
officers based upon
the evaluation of the
performance of the CEO
and the other elected
officers, respectively;
-
making
recommendations to the
Board of Directors with
respect to new cash-based
incentive compensation
plans and equity-based
compensation plans;
and
-
preparing
an annual performance
self-evaluation of the
Compensation Committee.
In addition, the Committee:
-
administers
the Company's stock
plans;
-
determines
and certifies the
shares awarded under
corporate performance-based
plans;
-
grants
options and awards
under the Company's
stock plans;
-
advises
on the setting of
compensation for senior
executives whose compensation
is not otherwise set
by the Committee;
-
monitors
compliance by officers
with our program of
required stock ownership;
and
-
publishes
an annual Compensation
Committee Report for
the shareholders.
The Committee may,
in its sole discretion,
employ a compensation
consultant, and has
done so, to assist in
the evaluation of the
Company's CEO and other
elected officers. The
Committee also has the
authority, as necessary
and appropriate, to
consult with other outside
advisors to assist in
its duties to the Company.
View
the Compensation Committee
Charter
The Board
of Directors has determined
that each of the members
of the Compensation
Committee is independent,
as defined by the rules
of the NASDAQ.
The Science
and Technology Committee
was established in 2003.
Under the terms of its
Charter, the Committee
is responsible for periodically
examining management's
direction and investment
in the Company's pharmaceutical
research and development
as well as in its technology
initiatives.
The Committee
may meet privately with
independent consultants
and be free to speak
directly and independently
with any members of
management in discharging
its responsibilities.
In addition, the Committee
will:
-
review,
evaluate and report
to the Board of Directors
regarding the performance
of the research leaders
in achieving long-term
strategic goals and
objectives and the
quality and direction
of the Company's pharmaceutical
research and development
programs;
-
identify
and discuss significant
emerging science and
technology issues
and trends;
-
determine
whether there is sufficient
and ongoing external
review from world-class
experts across both
research and development,
pertaining to the
Company's therapeutic
areas;
-
review
the Company's approaches
to acquiring and maintaining
a range of distinct
technology positions
(including, but not
limited to, contracts,
grants, collaborative
efforts, alliances
and venture capital);
-
evaluate
the soundness/risks
associated with the
technology in which
the Company is investing
its research and development
efforts;
-
periodically
review the Company's
overall patent strategies;
and
-
prepare
an annual performance
evaluation of the
Science and Technology
Committee.
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|